Skills / Reconciliation and close, Audit and assurance

AR aging tie-out

What it does

Ties the accounts receivable aging to the GL control account, then recomputes every bucket from the invoice date and compares that to the buckets the report printed.

Almost everyone runs the first test and stops. It is necessary and nearly worthless on its own, because the total can agree while the aging itself is wrong — and the aging is what drives the allowance, the collectibility discussion, and the confirmation sample.

Four things go wrong beneath a correct total. Mis-bucketed invoices, where the report ages from the wrong date or fails to re-age after a partial payment. Netted credit balances — a customer with a $90,000 open invoice and an $85,000 unapplied credit shows as $5,000 current, and both numbers matter. Unapplied cash sitting as a negative current balance, which usually means cash was received against an invoice nobody closed. And invoices dated after period end in the aging, which overstates revenue and receivables in the same stroke.

What it proves

Seven tests, and no clean workpaper unless:

  • The aging total equals the GL control account balance — you supply the GL figure.
  • The buckets foot — bucket amounts sum to each customer's total, and customer totals to the report total.
  • Every bucket agrees to a recomputation from the invoice date, using the stated bucket boundaries and as-of date. Any invoice in the wrong bucket is reported individually rather than netted into a bucket difference.
  • Debits and credits are shown gross, not netted, at customer level.

Where subsequent receipts are supplied, aged balances are shown with and without post-period collection activity — which is what distinguishes a collection-timing issue from a valuation one.

What you get

Seven tabs:

  1. Tie-Out Summary — the seven tests, the GL agreement, aging profile, concentration, and the allowance analysis. The signable page.
  2. Re-aged Detail — every invoice with the bucket per the report, the recomputed bucket, days outstanding, days past terms, and any flag. Mis-bucketed invoices sort to the top.
  3. By Customer — gross debits, gross credits, net balance, bucket distribution, days past terms on the oldest item, and share of total AR.
  4. Exceptions — every finding with the invoice and dollar effect.
  5. Credit Balances — all credit balances with age, separated from the debit aging entirely.
  6. Allowance Analysis — allowance as a percentage of total and of each bucket, coverage of balances past terms, and the customers driving the exposure.
  7. Subsequent Receipts — aged balances with and without post-period collection activity.

Where it stops

It does not set the allowance. It reports coverage, the aging profile, concentration, and the customers driving exposure — the judgement stays with the person signing.

Journal entries posted directly to the AR control account, material credit balances aged beyond a few months, aged balances with no receipts and no collection activity, related-party receivables mixed into trade AR, an allowance that has not moved while the aging deteriorated, write-offs late in the period clearing balances about to become conspicuously aged: each is reported as a fact. Unclaimed-property questions are flagged for confirmation against the applicable rules rather than assumed.