Skills / Audit and assurance

Bank reconciliation review

What it does

Audits a bank reconciliation someone else prepared — which is a different procedure from preparing one, and the easier one to do badly.

The preparer starts from two records and works toward agreement. The reviewer starts from a document that already claims agreement and has to establish whether that claim is true. A reconciliation that foots looks finished, and a reconciliation can foot perfectly and still be worthless.

Three ways that happens. A fabricated reconciling item — an "outstanding check" or "deposit in transit" that exists only on the reconciliation, inserted to make the two sides agree. A stale item rolled forward — genuine years ago, never cleared, never investigated, carried each month because removing it would break the reconciliation. A plug with a plausible labelTiming, Bank adjustment, Unidentified deposit, Items in transit, where the label is doing the work rather than the item.

All three survive a review that only checks the arithmetic. The test that catches all three is subsequent clearance: a real reconciling item appears in the next period's bank statement, and a fabricated one never does.

What it proves

Eight tests, and no clean workpaper unless:

  • The reconciliation is independently recomputed from item detail and agrees to what the preparer presented. The preparer's subtotals are not accepted.
  • The bank balance is agreed to the bank statement and the book balance to the general ledger, as two independent sources. Agreeing the reconciliation to itself proves nothing.
  • Every reconciling item is supported — traced to the bank statement, the subsequent-period statement, or a document. An item with no support is reported, never accepted.
  • Subsequent clearance is tested where a subsequent statement is available, and every item that did not clear is reported individually.

What you get

Seven tabs:

  1. Review Summary — the independent recomputation against the preparer's figures, the eight tests, the control observations, and the conclusion. The signable page.
  2. Independent Recomputation — the four-column form rebuilt from item detail, alongside what the preparer presented, with differences.
  3. Item Testing — every reconciling item: amount, category, support obtained, whether it cleared, when, days to clear, and any flag. Unsupported and uncleared items sort to the top.
  4. Uncleared Items — everything that did not clear, with age and the follow-up required.
  5. Stale Items — items carried from prior reconciliations, with the number of periods.
  6. Plug Indicators — generic descriptions, round amounts, and items with no counterpart.
  7. Control Observations — preparation timeliness, review evidence, segregation of duties.

Where it stops

It states each finding as a fact with the item reference and amount, and does not characterise intent.

A reconciling item with no counterpart in any bank statement before or after is escalated regardless of amount — that is the fabricated-item pattern. So are a deposit in transit that never cleared, an item carried on three or more consecutive reconciliations, a reconciliation that only foots because of a generically labelled item, an unreviewed reconciliation or one prepared by someone with disbursement authority, a reconciliation prepared long after period end, adjusting entries made to the cash account rather than the reconciliation, and prior-period items that disappeared without clearing.

The arithmetic is rarely the finding. What lacks support and what did not clear is.